三和一善 這是加速發現以幫助地球的方法
This is a way to speed up discovery to help the earth
In an exclusive article, the actor and his co-author said
that the science fund was broken and their own "quick grant" was
initiated.
If there is a Nobel Prize for overcoming the adversity of
bureaucracy, do you know who will win it? Catherine Katie. Her research on mRNA
properties has had little support for decades, which led to the development of
a COVID-19 vaccine, and her story has transcended science. It exposes the blind
spots of our current scientific institutions in finding and training every
enthusiastic scientist and research direction.
What can we learn from Katie's story to ensure that we
don't quietly lose the next bright mind and breakthrough idea?
This is not a hypothetical question. This is an emergency.
Early research on the impact of the pandemic on scientific output has shown
that new projects have fallen sharply in the past year; especially among
early-career researchers. This is a terrible timing. The challenges posed by
climate change require us to encourage every scientist, rather than discourage
or ignore them.
If we really want to make the planet net zero emissions, we
need to change the way we produce and consume electricity. We need newer, more
efficient means of transportation, and food supplies that are not dependent on
deforestation. We need climate-friendly agriculture and better ways to protect
the ecosystem. We must capture and remove existing greenhouse gases. We need to
iterate continuously to improve efficiency. For all the above situations, we
need the best minds to solve the right problems, and fast.
Unfortunately, if our existing scientific institutions have
one major shortcoming, it is speed. In the early days of the pandemic, as
researchers raced to learn about COVID-19 and test response ideas, a group of
outside philanthropists stepped up to create rapid grants to provide rapid
turnover of financial resources for new problems and ideas. The plan is not
just about funding projects, it also shows that there is a more effective and
less bureaucratic way to support scientists.
There is a new working paper-Funding Risk Research-in which
leading scientific economists outline the challenges of the current funding
system in supporting high-risk, high-return research. The author delves into
Katie’s story and matches it with a
literature review of problem-solving ideas and efforts. At the end of the
paper, some alternative examples were given and called for more experiments.
Unfortunately, the major scientific funding agencies seem to be constrained by
catch-22.
Funding risky research first requires betting on new risky
models. To help prevent the leakage of the scientific talent funnel, our team
is launching a new project: FootPrint Coalition Science Engine.
We are in the business of supporting entrepreneurial
scientists, and we agree that the main obstacle is the obvious limitation of
the committee's decision-making. We are trying different things. The Footprint
Alliance is funding early research in a new environmental field, under the
guidance of respected scientific leaders, who can act quickly and decide on
funding. The FootPrint Coalition Science Engine builds on the recommendations
made in the Funding Risky Research paper. It implemented "easy funding for
early risk exploration," but it did not tie it to universities.
We are doing this work "openly" on the
"experimental funding" platform, which is a website for crowdfunding
scientific research projects, so anyone can participate as a co-funder.
This is an experiment in an important research field. Here
are our top five categories and the people at the helm of each category:
Indigenous knowledge is the key to rebuilding the relationship between humans
and the natural world, and Dr. Keolu Fox is funding Indigenous Future Projects
to enhance the capabilities of Indigenous researchers and innovators who
request Right questions and put this knowledge into action.
Air, water, and soil pollution have a disproportionate
impact on the low-wealth Black, Aboriginal, and People of Color (BIPOC)
population. Dr. Sam Wilson, associate professor at the University of Maryland,
is funding community science and environmental justice projects to bring
science and research to the communities most affected by pollution and climate
change.
Emerging biotechnology is changing the way scientists
understand, monitor, and intervene in ecosystems. The leaders of Revive &
Restore, Dr. Bridgida Betty and Dr. Raymond Phillips, are funding conservation
biotechnology projects that use these new tools.
Cell agriculture is the production of agricultural
products, such as meat, milk and eggs, through cell culture instead of whole
animals. Ida Dennis, executive director of New Harvest, is funding projects
that advance the technology, as well as projects that explore the social,
economic, and political aspects of cellular agriculture.
Artificial intelligence can help us find the next major
breakthrough faster than ourselves. MIT PhD and entrepreneur Jeff Weis is
funding neglected research, using machine learning algorithms to put this
hypothesis into practice.
The rapid COVID-19 funding shows us a path and proves that
leadership can come from anywhere. The Footy Coalition Science Engine is
designed for radical participation. You are invited.
Science has made rapid progress in responding to this
epidemic. Let us build funding models and support systems to help them do the
same for the planet; we need it now.
Comments
Post a Comment